Analysis / Union

Philadelphia called the 40th-most valuable soccer club in the world

Photo Paul Rudderow

The website Sportico: The business of sport a few weeks ago published its 2025 valuations of the 50 most valuable soccer clubs in the world. (Click here for the original article, including partial explanations how the valuations were reached.) Real Madrid is rated most valuable ($6.53 billion) with Crystal Palace rated 50th($610 million). The top 15 richest teams are all in Europe. But MLS landed 19 clubs in Sportico’s top 50, followed by the English Premier League with 14.

We assume Sportico likes MLS’s overall business strategy restricting high-risk financing. How they express that judgment concretely in their data we have no idea.

Sportico’s valuations include real estate and related businesses. For example, Philadelphia’s WSFS Sportsplex is almost certainly included. So is Union Yards where principal owner Jay Sugarman’s photo was taken. Whether ownership’s non-soccer assets may be included to some degree is unknown.

Below we list those 19 MLS clubs ranked as Sportico ranks them. We add their places in the overall ranking of the top 50. Sportico says it used its previous MLS valuations published January 29th, 2025. Accessing that data directly requires a subscription.

Since the chart compares clubs that use a spring-summer-fall calendars to fall-winter-spring ones, the revenue comparison subheading covers both.

MLS All   2025 Valuation 2023-24 Revenue
1st 16th LosAngeles Football Club 1.280 billion 142 million
2nd 17th Inter Miami CF 1.190 billion 190 million
3rd 18th Los Angeles Galaxy 1.110 billion 110 million
4th 19th Atlanta United 1.080 billion 131 million
5th 20th New York City FC 1.000 billion 79 million
6th 23rd Austin FC 865 million 96 million
7th 25th Seattle Sounders 825 million 83 million
8th 33rd Columbus Crew 730 million 84 million
9th 34th Toronto FC 725 million 75 million
10th 35th FC Cincinnati 725 million 84 million
11th 36th D. C. United 720 million 65 million
12th 37th Portland Timbers 720 million 70 million
13th 39th Charlotte FC 705 million 87 million
14th 40th Philadelphia Union 700 million 67 million
15th 42nd St. Louis CITY SC 655 million 79 million
16th 43rd Minnesota United 655 million 69 million
17th 44th Sporting Kansas City 650 million 71 million
18th 45th New York Red Bull 645 million 56 million
19th 46th Nashville SC 640 million 64 million

For interest we add below a ranking of the 19 MLS clubs by Sportico’s 2024 revenue estimates.

2023-24 Revenue
1st Inter Miami CF 190 million
2nd Los Angeles Football Club 142 million
3rd Atlanta United 131 million
4th Los Angeles Galaxy 110 million
5th Austin FC 96 million
6th Charlotte FC 87 million
7th Columbus Crew 84 million
8th FC Cincinnati 84 million
9th Seattle Sounders 83 million
10th New York City FC 79 million
11th St. Louis CITY SC 79 million
12th Toronto FC 75 million
13th Sporting Kansas City 71 million
14th Portland Timbers 70 million
15th Minnesota United 69 million
16th Philadelphia Union 67 million
17th D. C. United 65 million
18th Nashville SC 64 million
19th New York Red Bull 56 million

The 11 MLS clubs for which we do not have specific revenue data are given in alphabetical order. Please do not assume their revenues are less than the Sportico numbers given above, for example, San Diego’s and Vancouver’s are probably fairly healthy.

Chicago Fire FC
Colorado Rapids
FC Dallas
Houston Dynamo FC
CF Montreal
New England Revolution
Orlando City
Real Salt Lake
San Diego FC
San Jose Earthquakes
Toronto FC
Vancouver Whitecaps FC

 

Philadelphia

 That Philadelphia is ranked the 40th-most valuable soccer club in the world may surprise its fans. Its waterfront real estate holdings are part of the valuation. The valuation includes an assessment of potential future value in addition to actual current ones. Sportico does not detail concretely how it generated its numbers.

Philadelphia has the fourth-lowest revenue of the MLS clubs listed at $67 million.

We assume Sportico likes Philadelphia’s long-term business plan that emphasizes player development, including through its academy, and its avoidance of overpaying aging big name veterans such as — gulp –Daniel Gazdag.

A cautionary postscript

During the 19th century on Wall Street speculative valuation of future potential was referred to as “watering the stock,” for example when valuing shares in proposed railroads yet to be built. We cannot judge how much “water” there is in Sportico’s valuations of MLS teams. In Philadelphia’s case we have no idea how they value the Union’s long-term business model, for example.

10 Comments

  1. SoccerDad says:

    How much of Miami’s “revenue” is the over-large chunk of money that the Apple TV deal pays them to pass through to its star?

  2. Gruncle Bob says:

    Very interesting, and yet Jay Sugarman absolutely, positively cannot afford another actual designated player.

    • OCTinPHL says:

      You do know that the value of the club has very little, or even no, bearing on whether the club can afford a player?
      ~
      According to Forbes, the Union lost ~9 million dollars last year.

      • Gruncle Bob says:

        Do you know that the club can borrow with equity as collateral? Your statement is, well, just incorrect.

      • OCTinPHl says:

        Sorry Gruncle, it’s not that simple. But you keep thinking it is.

      • OCTinPHL says:

        “ Do you know that the club can borrow with equity as collateral? Your statement is, well, just incorrect.”

        Uh, no. The value of $700m has absolutely no bearing on what the Union can borrow. The $700m is not “equity”. It is a made up valuation that some reporter thinks the Union are worth.

        Have you read the Union’s P&L’s? Didn’t think so.

        You, Gruncle, are “just incorrect.”

      • OCTinPHL says:

        Gruncle:

        Would you lend a team that lost $8m a year more money?

        https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2025/02/21/the-most-valuable-mls-teams-2025/

        The team does not have $700m in equirty.

  3. OCTinPHL says:

    Why can’t I comment in response? What is wrong with this website?

    • Tim Jones says:

      Sometimes I cannot comment either.
      .
      My knowledge of how websites work is non-existent, so I share your frustratiion.

Leave a Reply to Gruncle Bob Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*