Photo Paul Rudderow
The website Sportico: The business of sport a few weeks ago published its 2025 valuations of the 50 most valuable soccer clubs in the world. (Click here for the original article, including partial explanations how the valuations were reached.) Real Madrid is rated most valuable ($6.53 billion) with Crystal Palace rated 50th($610 million). The top 15 richest teams are all in Europe. But MLS landed 19 clubs in Sportico’s top 50, followed by the English Premier League with 14.
We assume Sportico likes MLS’s overall business strategy restricting high-risk financing. How they express that judgment concretely in their data we have no idea.
Sportico’s valuations include real estate and related businesses. For example, Philadelphia’s WSFS Sportsplex is almost certainly included. So is Union Yards where principal owner Jay Sugarman’s photo was taken. Whether ownership’s non-soccer assets may be included to some degree is unknown.
Below we list those 19 MLS clubs ranked as Sportico ranks them. We add their places in the overall ranking of the top 50. Sportico says it used its previous MLS valuations published January 29th, 2025. Accessing that data directly requires a subscription.
Since the chart compares clubs that use a spring-summer-fall calendars to fall-winter-spring ones, the revenue comparison subheading covers both.
MLS | All | 2025 Valuation | 2023-24 Revenue | |
1st | 16th | LosAngeles Football Club | 1.280 billion | 142 million |
2nd | 17th | Inter Miami CF | 1.190 billion | 190 million |
3rd | 18th | Los Angeles Galaxy | 1.110 billion | 110 million |
4th | 19th | Atlanta United | 1.080 billion | 131 million |
5th | 20th | New York City FC | 1.000 billion | 79 million |
6th | 23rd | Austin FC | 865 million | 96 million |
7th | 25th | Seattle Sounders | 825 million | 83 million |
8th | 33rd | Columbus Crew | 730 million | 84 million |
9th | 34th | Toronto FC | 725 million | 75 million |
10th | 35th | FC Cincinnati | 725 million | 84 million |
11th | 36th | D. C. United | 720 million | 65 million |
12th | 37th | Portland Timbers | 720 million | 70 million |
13th | 39th | Charlotte FC | 705 million | 87 million |
14th | 40th | Philadelphia Union | 700 million | 67 million |
15th | 42nd | St. Louis CITY SC | 655 million | 79 million |
16th | 43rd | Minnesota United | 655 million | 69 million |
17th | 44th | Sporting Kansas City | 650 million | 71 million |
18th | 45th | New York Red Bull | 645 million | 56 million |
19th | 46th | Nashville SC | 640 million | 64 million |
For interest we add below a ranking of the 19 MLS clubs by Sportico’s 2024 revenue estimates.
2023-24 Revenue | ||
1st | Inter Miami CF | 190 million |
2nd | Los Angeles Football Club | 142 million |
3rd | Atlanta United | 131 million |
4th | Los Angeles Galaxy | 110 million |
5th | Austin FC | 96 million |
6th | Charlotte FC | 87 million |
7th | Columbus Crew | 84 million |
8th | FC Cincinnati | 84 million |
9th | Seattle Sounders | 83 million |
10th | New York City FC | 79 million |
11th | St. Louis CITY SC | 79 million |
12th | Toronto FC | 75 million |
13th | Sporting Kansas City | 71 million |
14th | Portland Timbers | 70 million |
15th | Minnesota United | 69 million |
16th | Philadelphia Union | 67 million |
17th | D. C. United | 65 million |
18th | Nashville SC | 64 million |
19th | New York Red Bull | 56 million |
The 11 MLS clubs for which we do not have specific revenue data are given in alphabetical order. Please do not assume their revenues are less than the Sportico numbers given above, for example, San Diego’s and Vancouver’s are probably fairly healthy.
Chicago Fire FC |
Colorado Rapids |
FC Dallas |
Houston Dynamo FC |
CF Montreal |
New England Revolution |
Orlando City |
Real Salt Lake |
San Diego FC |
San Jose Earthquakes |
Toronto FC |
Vancouver Whitecaps FC |
Philadelphia
That Philadelphia is ranked the 40th-most valuable soccer club in the world may surprise its fans. Its waterfront real estate holdings are part of the valuation. The valuation includes an assessment of potential future value in addition to actual current ones. Sportico does not detail concretely how it generated its numbers.
Philadelphia has the fourth-lowest revenue of the MLS clubs listed at $67 million.
We assume Sportico likes Philadelphia’s long-term business plan that emphasizes player development, including through its academy, and its avoidance of overpaying aging big name veterans such as — gulp –Daniel Gazdag.
A cautionary postscript
During the 19th century on Wall Street speculative valuation of future potential was referred to as “watering the stock,” for example when valuing shares in proposed railroads yet to be built. We cannot judge how much “water” there is in Sportico’s valuations of MLS teams. In Philadelphia’s case we have no idea how they value the Union’s long-term business model, for example.
How much of Miami’s “revenue” is the over-large chunk of money that the Apple TV deal pays them to pass through to its star?
Very interesting, and yet Jay Sugarman absolutely, positively cannot afford another actual designated player.
You do know that the value of the club has very little, or even no, bearing on whether the club can afford a player?
~
According to Forbes, the Union lost ~9 million dollars last year.
Do you know that the club can borrow with equity as collateral? Your statement is, well, just incorrect.
Sorry Gruncle, it’s not that simple. But you keep thinking it is.
“ Do you know that the club can borrow with equity as collateral? Your statement is, well, just incorrect.”
Uh, no. The value of $700m has absolutely no bearing on what the Union can borrow. The $700m is not “equity”. It is a made up valuation that some reporter thinks the Union are worth.
Have you read the Union’s P&L’s? Didn’t think so.
You, Gruncle, are “just incorrect.”
Gruncle:
Would you lend a team that lost $8m a year more money?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2025/02/21/the-most-valuable-mls-teams-2025/
The team does not have $700m in equirty.
Why can’t I comment in response? What is wrong with this website?