Analysis / Union

Thinking forward

Photo: Stephen Speer

The weather in Chester on Saturday and Wednesday evenings could not have been more contrasting. Fittingly, too was the polarity in the quality of the Union’s play through the midfield on either night.

On Saturday, a restless home crowd observed a sour display of awry passing, causing each build-up to fizzle out just as quickly as it began. That was until Jim Curtin looked to the bench after a lifeless hour of play, bringing on Jack McGlynn for Leon Flach. Subsequently, the Union found their footing.

Tuesday, it was a slightly different tune. This time, McGlynn got the nod over Flach against Atlas FC — a change that sparked some quality into the rest of the XI for a full 90 minutes.

Coincidence? Surely that point could have been made in matches against Miami or Chicago, but this has become a trend. The eye test says it is obvious. McGlynn comes on for Flach, accompanied by a simple change in tactics, and just like that the Union become more dangerous in the attacking third.

But what do the numbers show?

Take a look at these 2023 offensive metrics in MLS play:

2023 Totals in MLS

Leon Flach

Jack McGlynn
Minutes Played

431

90

Pass Completion %

73.4

84.6

Expected Assists

0.3

0.2

Key Passes

4

3

Passes into Final 1/3

11

14

Progressive Passes

10

15

Passes into Pen. Area

3

3

Shot-Creating Actions

9

7

Goal-Creating Actions

2

0

Prog. Passes Rec’d

8

4

Touches

168

100

The disparity becomes even more astounding when you consider these same metrics per 90 minutes:

2023 Stats   per 90 in MLS

Leon Flach

Jack McGlynn

Expected Assists

0.06

0.2

Key Passes

0.83

3

Passes into Final 1/3

2.29

14

Progressive Passes

2.08

15

Passes into Pen. Area

0.63

3

Shot-Creating Actions

1.88

7

Goal-Creating Actions

0.42

0

Prog. Passes Rec’d

1.67

4

Touches

35

100

(Stats courtesy of FBref)

Not so neat and tidy

In Saturday’s match against Sporting KC, Flach’s passes found Union feet 52.9% of the time. When the full six MLS games are considered, Flach’s completion rate sits at 73.4%. This is to say he turns the ball over one in every four times he touches it. For a central midfielder whose responsibilities include taking care of the ball while in possession, that is well below par.

Completing 84.6% of his passes this season in the league, McGlynn is much tidier, while also seeing much more of the ball per 90 minutes. McGlynn’s strengths in possession take significant pressure off of the other nine field players. Instead of his teammates carrying the weight of Flach’s shortcomings within the Union attack, McGlynn creates and contributes to offensive moves regularly which brings out the best of the players around him.

Providing a solid defensive effort and helping stymy an opponent’s attack is definitely part of the job description as a number 8. However, so is the ability to transition this defense to offense. If the Union are borrowing the ball for spurts, just for it to be returned to the opposition one in every four Flach touches, how exactly can this attack be effective?

Conversely, the Union seem to own the ball with attacking intent when McGlynn is included in the XI. Possession of the ball can be considered a form of defense, and possession with a purpose will always trump Flach’s defensive prowess. Albeit, McGlynn did show some flashes of improved defensive play against Atlas on Tuesday.

Feels like we only go backward, baby

And every part of McGlynn’s game says go ahead.

A Tame Impala jam goes something like that.

The disparity in the progressive passing metrics is stark. McGlynn’s fifteen progressive passes per 90 are at a rate seven times those of Flach’s. Number 31 in blue went the first 61 minutes of the match on Saturday without connecting on a forward pass greater than ten yards outside of the defensive third. McGlynn had a pair in his 27 minutes on Saturday, and 21 passes into the final third on Tuesday night, per FotMob.

It’s just as apparent in the chance creation metrics from the two. McGlynn has provided seven actions over 90 minutes that contribute directly to shots on goal. Two of these opportunities came at the weekend in his 27-minute spell. Flach’s 1.88 shot-creating actions per 90 are indicative of a player that lacks offensive ingenuity.

McGlynn unquestionably has a way with the forward pass. Especially those that switch play or gain entry into the offensive third, both displayed with zest in the Tuesday night Concacaf Champions League bout.

Thus, the eye test concurs.

Positioning and Movement

One of the harder sides of the game to quantify is the intelligence and effectiveness of players’ positioning and movement when they don’t have the ball.

One stat that does give some insight, however, is the progressive passes received metric. It can be used to depict how effective a player is at moving off the ball by demonstrating how well they find space in the attacking half — where quarters can be a bit tighter. Good players find creative ways to unearth space and control or receive the ball under pressure.

McGlynn has four progressive passes received per 90 minutes in MLS play, which more than doubles Flach’s rate. This stat jumped off the page, as McGlynn always seems to sit deeper and dictate the game with his own passes.

Nevertheless, McGlynn does find himself in really strong areas of the pitch, and this allows the attack to feed off of his service into dangerous areas. He found himself in some grade-A scoring opportunities against Atlas, including a chance created by and for himself where he unleashed a powerful strike on goal, testing Camilo Vargas.

Moving Forward

Some important context to consider is that in Flach’s and McGlynn’s stats above, only MLS playing time is considered — where they have played dissimilar minutes. With Flach typically starting and McGlynn coming on as a sub, therein are some differences to game flow that are not necessarily accounted for. Additionally, McGlynn’s impressive minutes in the CCL are also not captured in the statistics above.

That said, Curtin has been unwavering in his first-choice starting XI. While this consistency may have worked with very few hiccups on the back half of last year, Flach’s play in 2023 has not warranted minutes of a full-time starter on what is arguably the best XI in the league.

This is not to say that Flach should be forgotten or that he should not have a role within this team — the many competitions this season will require his defensive capability. His value can be overlooked and fits perfectly into the mold that Curtin touts. But his impressive form displayed last season has not carried over into 2023.

Even though starting McGlynn would be a departure from the normal defensive-first playing style and tactics that graced the Bermuda grass in the Soob throughout Curtin’s tenure, the Union are clearly a more dangerous team when the 2023 version of McGlynn is on the field. The match against Atlas FC can be used as a litmus test as to the potential of how pivotal McGlynn’s ability can be to the attacking nature of this group over 90 minutes. The analytics line up with the eye test succinctly. It is time to go a different direction — a forward-thinking one.

10 Comments

  1. Overall fair analysis but I think that you need to take out the game where Flach filled in for El Brujo to get a more accurate assessment. Flach’s play out of position and without other starters around him is a bit of an aberrancy. He was horrible and I’m sure his stats reflect that but it is also not his usual position nor is it comparable to McGlynn’s.

    I also think they are asked to do separate things but it appears to me that McGlynn has improved his defensive skill much more than Flach has improved his offensive ones.

    I support your argument for more Jack and less Leon but I think you overstate the differences when you don’t need to do so. Appreciate the article and glad you wrote it so I had a chance to stick in my 2 cents.

    Appreciate anyone willing to take the time put down their thoughts and push them out so rubes like me can make comments, particularly when their work is uncompensated.

    • Blake Zuschnitt says:

      Fair point. Appreciate the feedback.

      I agree with you, except Flach’s standard passing metrics in the Orlando city game where he played the 6, mostly mirror his averages. Taking them out of the sample would only make the argument for McGlynn more staggering. Felt it was necessary to keep them in for this exercise, as the sample already only captured 431 of his minutes.

  2. Yes, please, more McGlynn, less Flach in general. However, in the return match with Atlas, I’d start Flach to try to maintain the aggregate goal difference.

  3. el Pachyderm says:

    Appreciate the article. I agree and counter thusly….data data data…. all numbers numbers numbers
    .
    This is our world now.
    .
    There is qualitative data too
    .
    … and it comes in narrative form… All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy all work and no play makes jack a dull boy all work and no play makes jack a dull boy

  4. Deez Nuggs says:

    I appreciate the analysis and data. I think the data backs the eye test and the “common sense”, if you will, that McGlynn is more of an offensive creator than Flach. The numbers shock a bit. But I think common sense is also that Curtin plays Flach more for his defense and his work rate. For a truly fair analysis I would love to see some of those numbers side by side as well. In fact, I’d love to see year over year because it feels like, as you say, McGlynn has improved defensively and Flach perhaps has regressed a bit in offense. But without data we are having a conversation based only on our squishy human feelings. 🙂

  5. I disagree with the comment that this was a fair analysis. Flach is not as good on offense…see my shocked face. Was there any comparison of defense…no

    I would rather see mcglynn but this is cherry picking your data.

    This years union needs offensive help but the offense did not need huge contributions from flach last year so i doubt he is our critical failure point.

    • Agree with you, Dave.

      And what of Martinez?

      I would rather see him sit the bench, come on at 60 minutes, with Flach starting back (defense) and McGlynn starting up (offense)… and sorry but Captain must now be a replacement, NOT a starter.

      SHAKE IT UP JIM… YOU MUST DO SOMETHING, or move on to USMNT.

      McGlynn also MUST take ALL free kicks. Kai Wagner corner kicks are not effective…. ‘OVER THE DEFENDER! How many times do we need to yell that from sec 114?

      • Hard disagree on Martinez. While he may be a heart-attack inducing disciplinary problem…he is also the best option at D-mid, and one of the best in the league.

  6. Gruncle Bob says:

    Thanks very much for writing the piece. It’s difficult with the limited amount of information, but the numbers seem to back what we see, that Leon is offensively challenged. On defense, though, I think there is a significant risk that playing Jack more will lead to many more scoring opportunities for opposing teams. As frustrating as it is to watch Leon struggle, I trust JC to make the best judgment he can based upon what he sees in training every day.

  7. I think the important insight is not that Jack is better at passing or offense, it’s that by making himself available with good movement and having the trust of the other players means that he helps the team build and reduces pressure on the back line. Conversely, how many times do we see one of the center backs or Brujo just ignore Flach, which results in giveaways or desperate passes?
    Yes Leon is better at transition defense and pressing but now that other teams are residing the press by giving the Union the ball that’s less importance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*