Preseason left the Union faithful with a lot of questions, so many in fact that the most pressing questions were featured in a series of columns before the season started. But now we’re three games in and it’s time to start considering whether any of those questions have been answered. Granted three games isn’t even a tenth of the MLS season, but with no wins in those three, it’s hard to deny that answers need to present themselves sooner rather than later.
Are the Union a playoff team?
…the MLS Cup final is still the definitive answer when someone asks who won the league. And in order to make it to that final, a team has to make the playoffs, so the question facing the Union is the same facing every team in every league in this country: Will they make the playoffs?
It was too early to make predictions like that when I first wrote that article and a month later it’s still too early. But look at how the Union played against Toronto. Most pundits have the Reds making another deep playoff run, and the Union were in that game the entire 90 minutes. If Bedoya had put away his penalty, or if Mark Geiger hadn’t fallen for Jozy Altidore’s theatrics, the Union probably would have beaten that “guaranteed” playoff team. So if you thought they were postseason bound before, you should feel more confident in that opinion now. And if you never thought they were, you’re going to need a lot more convincing than two draws and a loss could ever show you.
If you’re still not sure you’re probably a rational person. Because, again, it’s only been three games.
Who will score the goals?
The Union don’t need (or have) a player capable of making a Golden Boot run and thus must rely on a collective effort and a lot of things going right. The question is, will it be enough? They need enough players to hit the 5 to 10-goal mark. So who could they be?
At the time, few would argue that this team’s strikers won’t be the answer to this most important of questions. And yet here we are with strikers C.J. Sapong and Jay Simpson as the only players on the scoresheet. Conversely, Chris Pontius’ contributions have been relatively unremarkable and Ilsinho (who appeared to be a real threat on goal in preseason) has been out with injury. We’ve yet to see meaningful minutes from Alberg or Picault, but considering that the Union have played 126 minutes needing a goal, you have to imagine they would have been out there if they could have been the difference. Unless …
Can Jim Curtin get the most out of his players?
This year, Curtin has depth, quality veterans, and rising youngsters. He has a superstar goalkeeper who earns his team points with his own personal highlight reel. His staff of assistants may be light in quantity, but it has quality, with assistant B.J. Callahan’s creative set pieces showing a tangible contribution from a team that includes Mike Sorber, Oka Nikolov, and technical director Chris Albright. Can Curtin and his team put it all together this year?
This one is probably the most important question and Dan Walsh hit the nail on the head when he suggested that “this is likely the year that Curtin either shows he belongs at this level or moves on to other, less blue and gold pastures.” He has been quicker to go to the bench this season, but it’s mathematically impossible for him to have been slower. The starting lineups have been nearly identical in all three games so far, with only Jay Simpson’s injury bringing about a change with C.J. Sapong sliding into his place. But that itself could be a product of injuries, as Ilsinho, Simpson, Yaro, Edu, Davies, Tribbett, and Carroll have all been unavailable for at least one game already this season. So it’s possible this isn’t traditional Curtin thick headedness, rather a shorthanded team making do with what they have available.
Whatever the reason for the frozen lineup, we still need to see more before we start sharpening our pitchforks. This is unquestionably the deepest roster the Union have ever fielded and if a manager costs the team points by failing to take advantage of depth they have no business leading an MLS team. But that depth needs to be available and healthy before any kind of final decision is made.
Will the midfield click?
This season, the Union will look to fill those three positions — for convenience, I’m just going to call them the 6, the 8, and the 10 — without Nogueira for the first time since 2014. The question is simple: Will it work?
None of these questions have definitive answers yet, but we’re seeing the beginnings of an answer for Peter Andrews’ question. At least when it comes to his 6 and 8, Medunjanin and Jones have both exceeded expectations, which is quite an achievement considering how much hype Jones in particular has had to live up to. Medunjanin is no spring chicken, but there’s no reason to expect he can’t keep doing what he’s best at all season long.
But things aren’t so sunny up at #10. Alejandro Bedoya, the highest paid Union player in team history, has failed to be the spark so many of us wanted him to be. That isn’t to say he is to be blamed for the team’s lack of success, he wasn’t brought in to play that position. But his skillset and style of play seem wasted in the position and it’s hard to not think that the team might be better served by putting him to work elsewhere on the field. Replacing Herbers on the wing and putting Alberg in the middle seems to be the most popular suggestion, and while it could be an experiment worth trying it also feels like a waste of talent for both Herbers and Bedoya.
So here we stand with two points after this international break, no closer to answering pretty much all of these questions. But the optimists should not be ignored when they point out that there’s no negative answers as well; someone could still have a breakout year scoring goals, Curtin could lead this team to victory, and with as much talent there is in this midfield, it’s hard to imagine it can’t be arranged for success. And if all that happens (and it very well could) what possible conclusion could there be other than another shot in the playoffs?
When will the Union win the World Cup? That’s what I want to know….If Chicago is asked do it, why can’t the U?
.
Sorry I had to.
When we bring Zlatan as our DP 🙂 Wait, so maybe LA will win it?
I agree Zlatan is a nation all to himself.
.
I think California can only bring up succession for a vote as a ballot agenda in 2017. The actual vote for succession has to wait till 2018. So it would at least have to wait till the next cycle for possible glory.
Secession, perhaps?
DOH! Thank you very much. I stand corrected once again.
World Cup? Maybe 10-15 years. I think we have a better shot at the Gold Cup.
Nice.
I will take “a Cup”… as in one. I don’t care who gives it to us 🙂
The 2016 Suncoast Invitational Cup didn’t do it for you?
so good.
They would need to win the CONCACAF Champions League first.
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_Club_World_Cup
I would much rather see Ilson at the 10-spot than Alberg. He’s a much better fit in just about every way.
You guys need to stop including Edu as an excuse and learn to Let Go, Let Mo. He’s not coming back.
.
As for answering questions, no, there haven’t been any answers. I’d also tone down the whole “we held our own, at HOME, against TFC in a game we laid out their star” theory as to why the U could make a serious climb from 10th to the vertigo inducing territory of 6th. Jim will Curtin this up, don’t get too excited.
In a first draft of this I described Jones as the biggest obstacle to Edu’s return since non-contact practice injuries. I’m with you, I think he’s gone as soon as the team finds a way to get rid of him.
Hey Mo?
I feel bad for Mo. He has been the good soldier through a tough time. I wonder how much value he has due to lack of playing time. Jones has been pretty good. Maybe great.So I don’t see Edu getting minutes.
I’d ideally like to swap herbers and bedoya for a run out and see how that goes…one plays wide and moves in the other plays inside and wanders wide let’s just flip it and see.